Hill Street Affordable Housing Project
Uralla Shire Council has resolved to transfer land at 15 Hill Street, Uralla to Homes North Community Housing for the development of new, long-term affordable housing. The transfer (set at a nominal value of $1) is conditional on Homes North securing grant funding to support construction.
The site, located behind the Post Office and currently home to four older aged-care units and vacant land, will be redeveloped into a multi-unit residential complex. The homes will be designed for essential workers, older residents, and people on low to moderate incomes who are struggling in the private rental market.
Council is contributing the land and supporting early planning, while Homes North, a Tier 1 regional housing provider, will manage the project and seek funding from the Housing Australia Future Fund. The planning phase is underway in 2025, with design work supported by a $65,000 grant from ACEN Australia.
The project reflects Council’s commitment to fairness, inclusion, and helping locals stay living and thriving in Uralla.
The Need for Affordable Housing in Uralla
Like many regional communities, Uralla is experiencing increasing pressure on housing availability and affordability. Rents have risen significantly in recent years, and there are fewer options for essential workers, older residents, and people on low to moderate incomes. This is particularly concerning in a town where stable, secure housing is vital to maintaining our close-knit, inclusive community.
Rental affordability, once a relative strength for Uralla, has declined. Our town was previously the most affordable municipality in the New England region—but in recent years, affordability has fallen below the regional average. Between 2020 and 2022, around 40 rental properties were listed annually. However, in 2022, the proportion of affordable rentals dropped sharply, coinciding with the construction phase of the New England Solar Farm. This sudden spike in demand shows how quickly large infrastructure projects can impact the local housing market.
Affordability improved slightly in 2023, with an increase in listings (67 compared to 44 the year before), but the lesson is clear: without long-term planning and dedicated affordable housing stock, our community is vulnerable to housing market shocks.
Council’s decision to support new affordable housing at Hill Street is a step toward creating more stable, inclusive housing options that support both current residents and future workers, and help Uralla manage growth on its own terms.
Affordable rentals in Uralla Region (Source:REMPLAN Key Issues Report – Uralla Local Housing Strategy)
Who’s Involved and How Decisions Are Made
Homes North is the delivery partner. They will design, build, and manage the housing, drawing on their experience as a Tier 1 Community Housing Provider. They also rent out the homes to eligible tenants under the Local Allocation Strategy.
Homes NSW ensures the land transfer is handled properly and in the public interest. They register an interest on the land title, which means the land can only ever be used for affordable housing. They also sit on the Steering Group to provide probity and policy oversight.
The Project is being delivered through a shared governance framework that makes sure the project is accountable, transparent, and shaped by community input. Three groups will work together, each with a different role:
- Steering Group – made up of senior representatives from Uralla Shire Council, Homes North, and Homes NSW. This group provides overall oversight, keeps the project on track, and ensures the land and funding agreements are properly managed.
- Project Working Group – made up of technical staff from Council and Homes North, supported by specialist consultants. This group coordinates the day-to-day planning and design work.
- Project Advisory Committee – made up of Councillors, residents, neighbours, and a local service provider. The Committee provides advice and feedback to ensure community voices are heard but does not make formal decisions.
Why is Council giving away land?
Some people have asked why Council would give away precious community-owned land. The short answer: it is not a gift, it is a co-investment and represents the best way to get new affordable homes built in Uralla, with the right safeguards in place.
Here’s how it works:
- Council’s role is to contribute the land.
- Homes North, a Tier 1 not-for-profit housing provider, brings their own equity, access to concessional finance, and the ability to apply for Commonwealth grants such as the Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF). Council can’t access these funding streams directly.
- Homes NSW acts as the safeguard. They register an interest on the land title, which means the land can never be sold off for another purpose. They also oversee the agreements to make sure the development happens as promised.
- Housing Australia is a Commonwealth government agency that manages the Housing Future Fund, a dedicated pool of Commonwealth funding for social and affordable housing investment. Homes North will need to secure a very large grant to enable the development.
Council has wanted to build more affordable housing for many years, but on our own we don’t have the scale, borrowing power, or specialist expertise to do it without exposing ratepayers to big risks. This partnership model has been developed between State and Commonwealth governments, the community housing sector, and pioneering councils like Shoalhaven City Council. It is the proven way for small councils like ours to deliver more housing while protecting the public interest.
What the Community Told Us
The decision to pursue an affordable housing development at Hill Street reflects not only Council’s strategic priorities, but also the values and aspirations shared by our community.
As part of the Draft Local Housing Strategy engagement in early 2025, community members were asked about key housing challenges and the role of Council in responding. Many survey respondents expressed concern about the rising cost of living, the lack of rental options for low-income earners, and the pressure on housing availability due to anticipated regional growth.
When asked whether Council should consider using Council-owned land to support affordable housing outcomes, the majority of responses (60%) were supportive, particularly if clear safeguards were in place and partnerships with experienced providers like Homes North were involved.
Survey responses collected for the development of the Uralla Housing Strategy, 2025Respondents also emphasised that new housing should “fit in” with Uralla’s character, be well located, and designed with community benefit in mind. Council has taken this feedback seriously, and it continues to guide planning for the Hill Street project.
Principles of Design
Homes North will be responsible for the final design, construction, and long-term maintenance of the new homes. That means they need to make sure the design works well for tenants and is practical to maintain. At the same time, it’s important that the look and feel of the buildings reflect Uralla’s community values.
To guide the design, Uralla Shire Council and Homes North have developed a set of high-level Design Principles. These are shaped by the pillars of our Community Strategic Plan and what we’ve heard from the community about housing. They sit above and beyond the usual planning rules, like heritage conservation requirements and the Uralla Development Control Plan. Providing advice and feedback on the Design Principles will be an early task of the Project Advisory Committee.
Hill Street Affordable Housing project - Principles of Design |
|---|
|
How the Homes Will Be Allocated
If we are successful and able to build the development, Homes North will ensure that new homes are allocated in a fair, transparent and consistent way, while directly responding to housing needs in the Uralla community.
Future tenancies at the Hill Street Affordable Housing Project will be guided by a Local Allocation Strategy, which sets out clear objectives and criteria for tenant selection.
To be eligible, households need to meet the NSW Affordable Housing Income Limits (very low, low, or moderate income) and show that they can’t reasonably afford a home in the private rental market.
NSW Affordable Housing Income Limits for regional NSW are:
Very Low | Low | Moderate | |
Single Adult | $30,400 | $48,600 | $72,900 |
Each additional adult (18 years or over) | Add $15,200 | Add $24,300 | Add $36,500 |
Each additional child (under 18 years) | Add $9,100 | Add $14,600 | Add $21,900 |
*Source: Homes NSW Social Housing Resources, Appendix: Income eligibility limits for affordable housing
Within the income limits, the strategy sets out some clear priorities:
- People who already live in the existing units at 15 Hill Street
- Key workers providing essential services in the community
- Older people who need accessible homes
- Households on low to moderate incomes who are in housing stress (spending more than 30% of their income on rent), such as single-parent families.
Preference will also be given to households with a strong local connection to Uralla (for example, people who live or work here, or who have close family support here).
Homes North will match the right home with the right household (for example, ensuring that accessible homes go to people who need them).
Learning from Shoalhaven's Successful Model
Uralla Shire Council has drawn inspiration from Shoalhaven City Council's successful approach to addressing housing affordability. In Bomaderry, Shoalhaven Council partnered with Southern Cross Housing to transform an underutilized site into 39 affordable dwellings. This project was made possible through the provision of Council-owned land and collaboration with state agencies.
Uralla Council staff visited the Bomaderry project to gain insights into effective strategies for delivering affordable housing. This firsthand experience has informed Uralla's approach, emphasizing the value of partnerships and the strategic use of Council resources to meet local housing needs.
For more information on Southern Cross Housing’s Bomaderry development: https://scch.org.au/portfolio/coomea_street/
Uralla Shire Council General Manager Toni Averay and Planning Officer Emily Sims with representatives from Shoalhaven City Council and Southern Cross Community HousingNext Steps:
The Hill Street project is still in the early stages. Over the coming months, Council and Homes North will work through planning and design, while keeping the community informed and involved. Key steps include:
- Establishing the Project Advisory Committee – Council invites nominations from tenants, neighbours, and local service providers.
- Design Stage – An architect will be appointed and detailed design work will begin, guided by the agreed Principles of Design. Community sessions will be held to share draft designs and hear feedback.
- Development Application (DA) – A DA will be prepared and lodged, which will go through the usual public notification and exhibition process.
- Funding Applications – Homes North will continue to pursue government grant funding, including opportunities through the Housing Australia Future Fund (expected in 2026).
Throughout this process, Council will lead community engagement and communications to make sure you are kept informed and have clear opportunities to provide input at key points.
Uralla Shire Council has resolved to transfer land at 15 Hill Street, Uralla to Homes North Community Housing for the development of new, long-term affordable housing. The transfer (set at a nominal value of $1) is conditional on Homes North securing grant funding to support construction.
The site, located behind the Post Office and currently home to four older aged-care units and vacant land, will be redeveloped into a multi-unit residential complex. The homes will be designed for essential workers, older residents, and people on low to moderate incomes who are struggling in the private rental market.
Council is contributing the land and supporting early planning, while Homes North, a Tier 1 regional housing provider, will manage the project and seek funding from the Housing Australia Future Fund. The planning phase is underway in 2025, with design work supported by a $65,000 grant from ACEN Australia.
The project reflects Council’s commitment to fairness, inclusion, and helping locals stay living and thriving in Uralla.
The Need for Affordable Housing in Uralla
Like many regional communities, Uralla is experiencing increasing pressure on housing availability and affordability. Rents have risen significantly in recent years, and there are fewer options for essential workers, older residents, and people on low to moderate incomes. This is particularly concerning in a town where stable, secure housing is vital to maintaining our close-knit, inclusive community.
Rental affordability, once a relative strength for Uralla, has declined. Our town was previously the most affordable municipality in the New England region—but in recent years, affordability has fallen below the regional average. Between 2020 and 2022, around 40 rental properties were listed annually. However, in 2022, the proportion of affordable rentals dropped sharply, coinciding with the construction phase of the New England Solar Farm. This sudden spike in demand shows how quickly large infrastructure projects can impact the local housing market.
Affordability improved slightly in 2023, with an increase in listings (67 compared to 44 the year before), but the lesson is clear: without long-term planning and dedicated affordable housing stock, our community is vulnerable to housing market shocks.
Council’s decision to support new affordable housing at Hill Street is a step toward creating more stable, inclusive housing options that support both current residents and future workers, and help Uralla manage growth on its own terms.
Affordable rentals in Uralla Region (Source:REMPLAN Key Issues Report – Uralla Local Housing Strategy)
Who’s Involved and How Decisions Are Made
Homes North is the delivery partner. They will design, build, and manage the housing, drawing on their experience as a Tier 1 Community Housing Provider. They also rent out the homes to eligible tenants under the Local Allocation Strategy.
Homes NSW ensures the land transfer is handled properly and in the public interest. They register an interest on the land title, which means the land can only ever be used for affordable housing. They also sit on the Steering Group to provide probity and policy oversight.
The Project is being delivered through a shared governance framework that makes sure the project is accountable, transparent, and shaped by community input. Three groups will work together, each with a different role:
- Steering Group – made up of senior representatives from Uralla Shire Council, Homes North, and Homes NSW. This group provides overall oversight, keeps the project on track, and ensures the land and funding agreements are properly managed.
- Project Working Group – made up of technical staff from Council and Homes North, supported by specialist consultants. This group coordinates the day-to-day planning and design work.
- Project Advisory Committee – made up of Councillors, residents, neighbours, and a local service provider. The Committee provides advice and feedback to ensure community voices are heard but does not make formal decisions.
Why is Council giving away land?
Some people have asked why Council would give away precious community-owned land. The short answer: it is not a gift, it is a co-investment and represents the best way to get new affordable homes built in Uralla, with the right safeguards in place.
Here’s how it works:
- Council’s role is to contribute the land.
- Homes North, a Tier 1 not-for-profit housing provider, brings their own equity, access to concessional finance, and the ability to apply for Commonwealth grants such as the Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF). Council can’t access these funding streams directly.
- Homes NSW acts as the safeguard. They register an interest on the land title, which means the land can never be sold off for another purpose. They also oversee the agreements to make sure the development happens as promised.
- Housing Australia is a Commonwealth government agency that manages the Housing Future Fund, a dedicated pool of Commonwealth funding for social and affordable housing investment. Homes North will need to secure a very large grant to enable the development.
Council has wanted to build more affordable housing for many years, but on our own we don’t have the scale, borrowing power, or specialist expertise to do it without exposing ratepayers to big risks. This partnership model has been developed between State and Commonwealth governments, the community housing sector, and pioneering councils like Shoalhaven City Council. It is the proven way for small councils like ours to deliver more housing while protecting the public interest.
What the Community Told Us
The decision to pursue an affordable housing development at Hill Street reflects not only Council’s strategic priorities, but also the values and aspirations shared by our community.
As part of the Draft Local Housing Strategy engagement in early 2025, community members were asked about key housing challenges and the role of Council in responding. Many survey respondents expressed concern about the rising cost of living, the lack of rental options for low-income earners, and the pressure on housing availability due to anticipated regional growth.
When asked whether Council should consider using Council-owned land to support affordable housing outcomes, the majority of responses (60%) were supportive, particularly if clear safeguards were in place and partnerships with experienced providers like Homes North were involved.
Survey responses collected for the development of the Uralla Housing Strategy, 2025Respondents also emphasised that new housing should “fit in” with Uralla’s character, be well located, and designed with community benefit in mind. Council has taken this feedback seriously, and it continues to guide planning for the Hill Street project.
Principles of Design
Homes North will be responsible for the final design, construction, and long-term maintenance of the new homes. That means they need to make sure the design works well for tenants and is practical to maintain. At the same time, it’s important that the look and feel of the buildings reflect Uralla’s community values.
To guide the design, Uralla Shire Council and Homes North have developed a set of high-level Design Principles. These are shaped by the pillars of our Community Strategic Plan and what we’ve heard from the community about housing. They sit above and beyond the usual planning rules, like heritage conservation requirements and the Uralla Development Control Plan. Providing advice and feedback on the Design Principles will be an early task of the Project Advisory Committee.
Hill Street Affordable Housing project - Principles of Design |
|---|
|
How the Homes Will Be Allocated
If we are successful and able to build the development, Homes North will ensure that new homes are allocated in a fair, transparent and consistent way, while directly responding to housing needs in the Uralla community.
Future tenancies at the Hill Street Affordable Housing Project will be guided by a Local Allocation Strategy, which sets out clear objectives and criteria for tenant selection.
To be eligible, households need to meet the NSW Affordable Housing Income Limits (very low, low, or moderate income) and show that they can’t reasonably afford a home in the private rental market.
NSW Affordable Housing Income Limits for regional NSW are:
Very Low | Low | Moderate | |
Single Adult | $30,400 | $48,600 | $72,900 |
Each additional adult (18 years or over) | Add $15,200 | Add $24,300 | Add $36,500 |
Each additional child (under 18 years) | Add $9,100 | Add $14,600 | Add $21,900 |
*Source: Homes NSW Social Housing Resources, Appendix: Income eligibility limits for affordable housing
Within the income limits, the strategy sets out some clear priorities:
- People who already live in the existing units at 15 Hill Street
- Key workers providing essential services in the community
- Older people who need accessible homes
- Households on low to moderate incomes who are in housing stress (spending more than 30% of their income on rent), such as single-parent families.
Preference will also be given to households with a strong local connection to Uralla (for example, people who live or work here, or who have close family support here).
Homes North will match the right home with the right household (for example, ensuring that accessible homes go to people who need them).
Learning from Shoalhaven's Successful Model
Uralla Shire Council has drawn inspiration from Shoalhaven City Council's successful approach to addressing housing affordability. In Bomaderry, Shoalhaven Council partnered with Southern Cross Housing to transform an underutilized site into 39 affordable dwellings. This project was made possible through the provision of Council-owned land and collaboration with state agencies.
Uralla Council staff visited the Bomaderry project to gain insights into effective strategies for delivering affordable housing. This firsthand experience has informed Uralla's approach, emphasizing the value of partnerships and the strategic use of Council resources to meet local housing needs.
For more information on Southern Cross Housing’s Bomaderry development: https://scch.org.au/portfolio/coomea_street/
Uralla Shire Council General Manager Toni Averay and Planning Officer Emily Sims with representatives from Shoalhaven City Council and Southern Cross Community HousingNext Steps:
The Hill Street project is still in the early stages. Over the coming months, Council and Homes North will work through planning and design, while keeping the community informed and involved. Key steps include:
- Establishing the Project Advisory Committee – Council invites nominations from tenants, neighbours, and local service providers.
- Design Stage – An architect will be appointed and detailed design work will begin, guided by the agreed Principles of Design. Community sessions will be held to share draft designs and hear feedback.
- Development Application (DA) – A DA will be prepared and lodged, which will go through the usual public notification and exhibition process.
- Funding Applications – Homes North will continue to pursue government grant funding, including opportunities through the Housing Australia Future Fund (expected in 2026).
Throughout this process, Council will lead community engagement and communications to make sure you are kept informed and have clear opportunities to provide input at key points.
Ask us about this project
Do you have a question about the Hill Street Affordable Housing Project? Submit your question below and we’ll respond as soon as possible.
-
Share Hello Emily, I am wondering if you are aware of the NSW Housing Pattern Book published by the NSW Govt. It is 'a guide for developing more sustainable and affordable low-and mid-rise homes'. www.planning.nsw.gov.au I thought that it might eliminate the need to employ an expensive architect and that money saved could be put to another use. Regards Marion Ryan on Facebook Share Hello Emily, I am wondering if you are aware of the NSW Housing Pattern Book published by the NSW Govt. It is 'a guide for developing more sustainable and affordable low-and mid-rise homes'. www.planning.nsw.gov.au I thought that it might eliminate the need to employ an expensive architect and that money saved could be put to another use. Regards Marion Ryan on Twitter Share Hello Emily, I am wondering if you are aware of the NSW Housing Pattern Book published by the NSW Govt. It is 'a guide for developing more sustainable and affordable low-and mid-rise homes'. www.planning.nsw.gov.au I thought that it might eliminate the need to employ an expensive architect and that money saved could be put to another use. Regards Marion Ryan on Linkedin Email Hello Emily, I am wondering if you are aware of the NSW Housing Pattern Book published by the NSW Govt. It is 'a guide for developing more sustainable and affordable low-and mid-rise homes'. www.planning.nsw.gov.au I thought that it might eliminate the need to employ an expensive architect and that money saved could be put to another use. Regards Marion Ryan link
Hello Emily, I am wondering if you are aware of the NSW Housing Pattern Book published by the NSW Govt. It is 'a guide for developing more sustainable and affordable low-and mid-rise homes'. www.planning.nsw.gov.au I thought that it might eliminate the need to employ an expensive architect and that money saved could be put to another use. Regards Marion Ryan
yes asked 2 months agoHi Marion,
Great suggestion. Yes, we are familiar with the NSW Housing Pattern Book. It’s a great initiative from the State Government that should make good low to mid-rise in-fill more cost effective to develop. The Pattern Book homes are not only environmentally sustainable and economical to build and run, they also give communities some reassurance that what’s being built will look good and feel right in its setting.
For Hill Street, the design will be guided by the Design Principles that Council and Homes North have developed together. Those principles talk about things like modest presentation, strong environmental performance, and a good fit with Uralla’s heritage character. Most of the Pattern Book designs already tick those boxes, so they’ll definitely be part of what we look at when briefing the architect.
Doesn't hurt that all the designs are $1 until January 2026!
-
Share After the meeting i felt like some of the some of the community questions were disregarded or brushed away. I know Uralla is growing but you also need to listen to the people who pay the rates of the community for us to be able to do these projects. Will the Uralla Shire Council be implementing financial and administrative controls to ensure that only a small percentage of affordable housing allocations are made available to out-of-shire applicants, and only in cases of genuine emergency? I had concerns when Homes North said it could be used for non-residents. on another question but related the infrastructure around this area needs to be considered as there is a water causeway which has been there since the build up of woodville as the water runs down across the railway and into Maitland St, then to the backyards of those existing dwellings and under the old chainsaw building so the water diversions need to be looked at long with traffic as Maitland st is already busy of a morning and evening. When will the design concepts be available for the community to have input. on Facebook Share After the meeting i felt like some of the some of the community questions were disregarded or brushed away. I know Uralla is growing but you also need to listen to the people who pay the rates of the community for us to be able to do these projects. Will the Uralla Shire Council be implementing financial and administrative controls to ensure that only a small percentage of affordable housing allocations are made available to out-of-shire applicants, and only in cases of genuine emergency? I had concerns when Homes North said it could be used for non-residents. on another question but related the infrastructure around this area needs to be considered as there is a water causeway which has been there since the build up of woodville as the water runs down across the railway and into Maitland St, then to the backyards of those existing dwellings and under the old chainsaw building so the water diversions need to be looked at long with traffic as Maitland st is already busy of a morning and evening. When will the design concepts be available for the community to have input. on Twitter Share After the meeting i felt like some of the some of the community questions were disregarded or brushed away. I know Uralla is growing but you also need to listen to the people who pay the rates of the community for us to be able to do these projects. Will the Uralla Shire Council be implementing financial and administrative controls to ensure that only a small percentage of affordable housing allocations are made available to out-of-shire applicants, and only in cases of genuine emergency? I had concerns when Homes North said it could be used for non-residents. on another question but related the infrastructure around this area needs to be considered as there is a water causeway which has been there since the build up of woodville as the water runs down across the railway and into Maitland St, then to the backyards of those existing dwellings and under the old chainsaw building so the water diversions need to be looked at long with traffic as Maitland st is already busy of a morning and evening. When will the design concepts be available for the community to have input. on Linkedin Email After the meeting i felt like some of the some of the community questions were disregarded or brushed away. I know Uralla is growing but you also need to listen to the people who pay the rates of the community for us to be able to do these projects. Will the Uralla Shire Council be implementing financial and administrative controls to ensure that only a small percentage of affordable housing allocations are made available to out-of-shire applicants, and only in cases of genuine emergency? I had concerns when Homes North said it could be used for non-residents. on another question but related the infrastructure around this area needs to be considered as there is a water causeway which has been there since the build up of woodville as the water runs down across the railway and into Maitland St, then to the backyards of those existing dwellings and under the old chainsaw building so the water diversions need to be looked at long with traffic as Maitland st is already busy of a morning and evening. When will the design concepts be available for the community to have input. link
After the meeting i felt like some of the some of the community questions were disregarded or brushed away. I know Uralla is growing but you also need to listen to the people who pay the rates of the community for us to be able to do these projects. Will the Uralla Shire Council be implementing financial and administrative controls to ensure that only a small percentage of affordable housing allocations are made available to out-of-shire applicants, and only in cases of genuine emergency? I had concerns when Homes North said it could be used for non-residents. on another question but related the infrastructure around this area needs to be considered as there is a water causeway which has been there since the build up of woodville as the water runs down across the railway and into Maitland St, then to the backyards of those existing dwellings and under the old chainsaw building so the water diversions need to be looked at long with traffic as Maitland st is already busy of a morning and evening. When will the design concepts be available for the community to have input.
willi.p asked 3 months agoHi willi.p,
Thanks for coming to the information session and for sharing your concerns here.
I’m sorry it felt like some questions were brushed aside—that’s never the intention. We know trust goes both ways, and Councillors and staff are working in good faith to get the best outcome for the whole community. One thing we’d ask in return is care with the information that’s shared online. When rumours or half-facts start circulating on social media, it can quickly erode trust and divide people. We’ll keep holding information sessions, answering questions, and sharing updates as the project moves forward.
The mechanism to ensure Uralla residents are given priority is the Local Allocation Strategy, which Council and Homes North have agreed on. It balances Homes North’s mission with Council’s aim of protecting Uralla’s social fabric. It gives clear priority to people with a local connection—those who already live or work here, or who need to move here for essential jobs such as aged-care nursing. People from outside the Shire may apply only if they meet the same eligibility criteria and priority groups, and only when no eligible local household is waiting. Any future change to that policy would require agreement from both Homes NSW and Council.
Thanks for your observations about the stormwater flows through the site. Any development application will need to include detailed storm-water management and traffic assessments, and Homes North will be required to meet Council’s engineering standards. Broader storm-water upgrades are part of Council’s ongoing capital works program (its a problem in lots of parts of town).
We’re aiming to share draft concept designs ASAP. Likely to be early next year, ahead of the anticipated Housing Australia Future Fund round.
Emily Sims
Strategic Planner | 6778 6404
-
Share Where is the existing affordable/social housing in Uralla.? How many people are already being catered for. I know of 15 ground level units in total for Uralla. on Facebook Share Where is the existing affordable/social housing in Uralla.? How many people are already being catered for. I know of 15 ground level units in total for Uralla. on Twitter Share Where is the existing affordable/social housing in Uralla.? How many people are already being catered for. I know of 15 ground level units in total for Uralla. on Linkedin Email Where is the existing affordable/social housing in Uralla.? How many people are already being catered for. I know of 15 ground level units in total for Uralla. link
Where is the existing affordable/social housing in Uralla.? How many people are already being catered for. I know of 15 ground level units in total for Uralla.
Kmacklin asked 3 months agoHello again, Kmacklin.
Community Housing Providers manage a significant number of properties in the New England North West region – including social housing, affordable housing, transitional housing and crisis accommodation. In Uralla, providers include Homes North CHP, MYOCH and Anaiwan Aboriginal CHPs.
It’s worth noting that affordable housing is not the same as social housing. Affordable housing is open to a broader range of household incomes and is managed more like a private rental, but with eligibility criteria based on income. People eligible for social housing may also qualify for affordable housing, but the reverse isn’t required.
The following table provides the Community Housing Stock per LGA in the New England and North West Region as a June 2022.

The next table gives the number of Aboriginal Housing Office (“AHO”) homes and the number managed by Aboriginal Community Housing Providers (“ACHPs”) in New England and in Northern NSW as at June 2022.

These statistics were provided to us by Homes NSW. Council itself currently owns and manages four units.
In Uralla, you can't really tell the social and affordable housing units from private rentals and private owner occupied properties. Uralla isn't exactly resplendent with rows of perfectly manicured lawns and perfectly maintained villas! Isn't that what we love about the place?
-
Share 1. Is affordable/social rental housing the next step for Uralla, already the jobs here are scarce. 2. Do we stay separated from Armidale homes North housing units and continue to be a unique country town? 3. Is aged housing an alternative? 4. If council is needing to increase land owner rates using the CVR model, do they need to hold onto the land value of 15 Hill street.? 5. How much is 15 Hill street valued at? 6. Will a housing development de-value properties around it? on Facebook Share 1. Is affordable/social rental housing the next step for Uralla, already the jobs here are scarce. 2. Do we stay separated from Armidale homes North housing units and continue to be a unique country town? 3. Is aged housing an alternative? 4. If council is needing to increase land owner rates using the CVR model, do they need to hold onto the land value of 15 Hill street.? 5. How much is 15 Hill street valued at? 6. Will a housing development de-value properties around it? on Twitter Share 1. Is affordable/social rental housing the next step for Uralla, already the jobs here are scarce. 2. Do we stay separated from Armidale homes North housing units and continue to be a unique country town? 3. Is aged housing an alternative? 4. If council is needing to increase land owner rates using the CVR model, do they need to hold onto the land value of 15 Hill street.? 5. How much is 15 Hill street valued at? 6. Will a housing development de-value properties around it? on Linkedin Email 1. Is affordable/social rental housing the next step for Uralla, already the jobs here are scarce. 2. Do we stay separated from Armidale homes North housing units and continue to be a unique country town? 3. Is aged housing an alternative? 4. If council is needing to increase land owner rates using the CVR model, do they need to hold onto the land value of 15 Hill street.? 5. How much is 15 Hill street valued at? 6. Will a housing development de-value properties around it? link
1. Is affordable/social rental housing the next step for Uralla, already the jobs here are scarce. 2. Do we stay separated from Armidale homes North housing units and continue to be a unique country town? 3. Is aged housing an alternative? 4. If council is needing to increase land owner rates using the CVR model, do they need to hold onto the land value of 15 Hill street.? 5. How much is 15 Hill street valued at? 6. Will a housing development de-value properties around it?
Kmacklin asked 3 months agoHi Kmacklin,
Thanks for your questions. I’ll tackle them one by one.Uralla’s unemployment rate at the last Census was around half the NSW average. When we talk to local businesses, we hear that finding and keeping staff is a real challenge—and the shortage of affordable rentals is part of that story. More rentals, especially affordable ones aimed at low- to moderate-income essential workers (like aged-care nursing staff), will help Uralla attract and retain the workers we need.
We know how much people value Uralla’s independence and small-town character. That’s why Homes North’s Allocation Strategy gives priority to people with a strong local connection—people who already live or work here, or who want to move back to be close to family.
Our Local Housing Strategy flagged both retirement/independent living and affordable rentals as gaps. It isn’t either/or. We need more options for older residents and for those on lower incomes, and we’re working on both fronts.
The proposed Special Rate Variation is about keeping Council financially sustainable. Whether Hill Street stayed vacant, was sold privately, or developed for affordable housing, we’d still need the SRV. Selling the land would only mean less influence over what gets built and a missed opportunity for a lasting social benefit.
The Hill Street site is currently valued at about $221,000 for the land and $403,000 for the buildings.
Evidence from similar projects shows that well-designed infill housing generally supports surrounding property values—especially with the required 7-star environmental and construction standards and heritage-sensitive design. Cleaning up things like the unsightly Telstra infrastructure should help too.
There are no concept plans yet. The number and mix of units will come through the design process, guided by the Principles of Design now on exhibition. Those principles emphasise a modest, heritage-appropriate outcome that fits the street.
-
Share Given the attendance at the community information evening. Are council really considering what the community want? The crowd seem quite angry with councils decision to undertake this project without community support. Is council fully aware of the community unrest regarding this project? Uralla doesn’t have the infrastructure, as mentioned in the meeting. Two doctors surgeries, no full police presence, no ambulance station, limited water supply. How is this sustainable? Community feedback, is that Homes North have a terribly reputation looking after residents and properties. It’s stated this is ‘Affordable Housing’, really as Homes North state on the web they offer ‘Affordable Social Housing’. To say priorities are given to the aged community is really a joke. It’s been stated there are ‘No plans’. Is the community expected to believe that? Council must have an approximate idea on how many units would be built, as it’s stated two storey, so pensioners in the ground floor and who’s above them? I feel council should rescind this decision and pursue a more appropriate avenue for the community. on Facebook Share Given the attendance at the community information evening. Are council really considering what the community want? The crowd seem quite angry with councils decision to undertake this project without community support. Is council fully aware of the community unrest regarding this project? Uralla doesn’t have the infrastructure, as mentioned in the meeting. Two doctors surgeries, no full police presence, no ambulance station, limited water supply. How is this sustainable? Community feedback, is that Homes North have a terribly reputation looking after residents and properties. It’s stated this is ‘Affordable Housing’, really as Homes North state on the web they offer ‘Affordable Social Housing’. To say priorities are given to the aged community is really a joke. It’s been stated there are ‘No plans’. Is the community expected to believe that? Council must have an approximate idea on how many units would be built, as it’s stated two storey, so pensioners in the ground floor and who’s above them? I feel council should rescind this decision and pursue a more appropriate avenue for the community. on Twitter Share Given the attendance at the community information evening. Are council really considering what the community want? The crowd seem quite angry with councils decision to undertake this project without community support. Is council fully aware of the community unrest regarding this project? Uralla doesn’t have the infrastructure, as mentioned in the meeting. Two doctors surgeries, no full police presence, no ambulance station, limited water supply. How is this sustainable? Community feedback, is that Homes North have a terribly reputation looking after residents and properties. It’s stated this is ‘Affordable Housing’, really as Homes North state on the web they offer ‘Affordable Social Housing’. To say priorities are given to the aged community is really a joke. It’s been stated there are ‘No plans’. Is the community expected to believe that? Council must have an approximate idea on how many units would be built, as it’s stated two storey, so pensioners in the ground floor and who’s above them? I feel council should rescind this decision and pursue a more appropriate avenue for the community. on Linkedin Email Given the attendance at the community information evening. Are council really considering what the community want? The crowd seem quite angry with councils decision to undertake this project without community support. Is council fully aware of the community unrest regarding this project? Uralla doesn’t have the infrastructure, as mentioned in the meeting. Two doctors surgeries, no full police presence, no ambulance station, limited water supply. How is this sustainable? Community feedback, is that Homes North have a terribly reputation looking after residents and properties. It’s stated this is ‘Affordable Housing’, really as Homes North state on the web they offer ‘Affordable Social Housing’. To say priorities are given to the aged community is really a joke. It’s been stated there are ‘No plans’. Is the community expected to believe that? Council must have an approximate idea on how many units would be built, as it’s stated two storey, so pensioners in the ground floor and who’s above them? I feel council should rescind this decision and pursue a more appropriate avenue for the community. link
Given the attendance at the community information evening. Are council really considering what the community want? The crowd seem quite angry with councils decision to undertake this project without community support. Is council fully aware of the community unrest regarding this project? Uralla doesn’t have the infrastructure, as mentioned in the meeting. Two doctors surgeries, no full police presence, no ambulance station, limited water supply. How is this sustainable? Community feedback, is that Homes North have a terribly reputation looking after residents and properties. It’s stated this is ‘Affordable Housing’, really as Homes North state on the web they offer ‘Affordable Social Housing’. To say priorities are given to the aged community is really a joke. It’s been stated there are ‘No plans’. Is the community expected to believe that? Council must have an approximate idea on how many units would be built, as it’s stated two storey, so pensioners in the ground floor and who’s above them? I feel council should rescind this decision and pursue a more appropriate avenue for the community.
Logiekirk asked 3 months agoHi Logiekirk,
Thanks for coming along to the information session and for sharing your thoughts here. A strong turnout—and strong feelings—show how much people care about Uralla’s future, and we appreciate everyone who came to listen and speak.
We know there’s a lot of discussion online, and some of it doesn’t always reflect the facts. Uralla is growing, and even without the renewable-energy projects we’re seeing pressure on housing. Preparing for that growth means planning for a mix of housing, especially for essential workers and residents on low incomes who are most at risk of being priced out.
On infrastructure: Council is very aware of water, health, and emergency-service constraints and continues to work with the relevant state agencies. The Hill Street site is within existing town services and has capacity to connect without new major infrastructure.
There are no concept plans yet—that’s why nothing has been released. The Design Principles, now on exhibition, will guide the architect once appointed. Community input through the Project Advisory Committee will help refine those principles, but the number of dwellings and detailed design will come through that process and the Development Application, which will also be publicly exhibited.
Homes North’s Draft Allocation Policy gives first priority to current tenants and sets clear criteria for future residents. Council will sign an agreement with Homes NSW so any changes to that policy would need both Homes NSW and Council approval.
Council has made the decision to proceed with this partnership, but we are committed to keeping the community informed and ensuring the design reflects Uralla’s character. Your thoughts on scale, materials, and how the building meets the street are exactly the kind of input we’re looking for as the design stage begins.
-
Share I don’t have questions as such but as a member of amplify 100 on housing held in February 2025 https://www.amplifyaus.org/amplification I feel that this is actually a great opportunity for uralla. It is sensibly placed, close to Dr, and shops as well as transport of the train and a preschool. They are looking to prioritise the people already living in the area and also have a clear and transparent guidance for salary levels for people who apply for housing in our community. The idea that they will be shovel ready says to me you are looking at some form of modular living or prefab which I believe can be delivered by companies in Armidale looking then to have more local employment even during construction. We want uralla to be a go ahead community but then when it goes ahead and provides housing people put out petitions making it hard for people who disagree to say anything for concern they will be shot down on social media etc. I hope council looks for more land like this that infills for social housing not just setting more disadvantaged communities in our town on the outskirts where even the shop’s post office and drs are then too far away to reach without some sort of vehicle transport on Facebook Share I don’t have questions as such but as a member of amplify 100 on housing held in February 2025 https://www.amplifyaus.org/amplification I feel that this is actually a great opportunity for uralla. It is sensibly placed, close to Dr, and shops as well as transport of the train and a preschool. They are looking to prioritise the people already living in the area and also have a clear and transparent guidance for salary levels for people who apply for housing in our community. The idea that they will be shovel ready says to me you are looking at some form of modular living or prefab which I believe can be delivered by companies in Armidale looking then to have more local employment even during construction. We want uralla to be a go ahead community but then when it goes ahead and provides housing people put out petitions making it hard for people who disagree to say anything for concern they will be shot down on social media etc. I hope council looks for more land like this that infills for social housing not just setting more disadvantaged communities in our town on the outskirts where even the shop’s post office and drs are then too far away to reach without some sort of vehicle transport on Twitter Share I don’t have questions as such but as a member of amplify 100 on housing held in February 2025 https://www.amplifyaus.org/amplification I feel that this is actually a great opportunity for uralla. It is sensibly placed, close to Dr, and shops as well as transport of the train and a preschool. They are looking to prioritise the people already living in the area and also have a clear and transparent guidance for salary levels for people who apply for housing in our community. The idea that they will be shovel ready says to me you are looking at some form of modular living or prefab which I believe can be delivered by companies in Armidale looking then to have more local employment even during construction. We want uralla to be a go ahead community but then when it goes ahead and provides housing people put out petitions making it hard for people who disagree to say anything for concern they will be shot down on social media etc. I hope council looks for more land like this that infills for social housing not just setting more disadvantaged communities in our town on the outskirts where even the shop’s post office and drs are then too far away to reach without some sort of vehicle transport on Linkedin Email I don’t have questions as such but as a member of amplify 100 on housing held in February 2025 https://www.amplifyaus.org/amplification I feel that this is actually a great opportunity for uralla. It is sensibly placed, close to Dr, and shops as well as transport of the train and a preschool. They are looking to prioritise the people already living in the area and also have a clear and transparent guidance for salary levels for people who apply for housing in our community. The idea that they will be shovel ready says to me you are looking at some form of modular living or prefab which I believe can be delivered by companies in Armidale looking then to have more local employment even during construction. We want uralla to be a go ahead community but then when it goes ahead and provides housing people put out petitions making it hard for people who disagree to say anything for concern they will be shot down on social media etc. I hope council looks for more land like this that infills for social housing not just setting more disadvantaged communities in our town on the outskirts where even the shop’s post office and drs are then too far away to reach without some sort of vehicle transport link
I don’t have questions as such but as a member of amplify 100 on housing held in February 2025 https://www.amplifyaus.org/amplification I feel that this is actually a great opportunity for uralla. It is sensibly placed, close to Dr, and shops as well as transport of the train and a preschool. They are looking to prioritise the people already living in the area and also have a clear and transparent guidance for salary levels for people who apply for housing in our community. The idea that they will be shovel ready says to me you are looking at some form of modular living or prefab which I believe can be delivered by companies in Armidale looking then to have more local employment even during construction. We want uralla to be a go ahead community but then when it goes ahead and provides housing people put out petitions making it hard for people who disagree to say anything for concern they will be shot down on social media etc. I hope council looks for more land like this that infills for social housing not just setting more disadvantaged communities in our town on the outskirts where even the shop’s post office and drs are then too far away to reach without some sort of vehicle transport
Dumaresq9 asked 3 months agoHi Dumaresq9,
Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts—and for pointing me to Amplify 100, what an inspiring community process! I found this video about the process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3YiDxVLYRA
“Shovel-ready” in this context doesn’t mean modular or prefab, it just means we’ll have all the planning approvals in place so we can start quickly once funding comes through. That said, we’re lucky to have strong prefab businesses in the region. We spoke with UniPlan during the Uralla Local Housing Strategy work, and they told us the biggest barrier to more modular homes is financing.
The NSW Government is also reviewing the planning rules for manufactured home estates and moveable dwellings, so we’re watching that closely. It’s great to see local builders and innovative construction methods on the radar as we keep looking for practical ways to support more housing in Uralla.
-
Share 1. Given that concept plans about what will be built (apart from bland statements about what council would like) have not been made public, when, and in what form will our community have the opportunity to comment and influence the type of housing? 2. I understand the current zoning for the land is E3 Productivity support under which "residential accommodation" is prohibited consequently the proposal will require an amendment to the LEP. Will this amendment be crafted to affect all the properties in the E3 zone so as to afford all property owners the same opportunity to develop affordable housing near our CBD or will it be specific to the blocks transfered to Homes North? on Facebook Share 1. Given that concept plans about what will be built (apart from bland statements about what council would like) have not been made public, when, and in what form will our community have the opportunity to comment and influence the type of housing? 2. I understand the current zoning for the land is E3 Productivity support under which "residential accommodation" is prohibited consequently the proposal will require an amendment to the LEP. Will this amendment be crafted to affect all the properties in the E3 zone so as to afford all property owners the same opportunity to develop affordable housing near our CBD or will it be specific to the blocks transfered to Homes North? on Twitter Share 1. Given that concept plans about what will be built (apart from bland statements about what council would like) have not been made public, when, and in what form will our community have the opportunity to comment and influence the type of housing? 2. I understand the current zoning for the land is E3 Productivity support under which "residential accommodation" is prohibited consequently the proposal will require an amendment to the LEP. Will this amendment be crafted to affect all the properties in the E3 zone so as to afford all property owners the same opportunity to develop affordable housing near our CBD or will it be specific to the blocks transfered to Homes North? on Linkedin Email 1. Given that concept plans about what will be built (apart from bland statements about what council would like) have not been made public, when, and in what form will our community have the opportunity to comment and influence the type of housing? 2. I understand the current zoning for the land is E3 Productivity support under which "residential accommodation" is prohibited consequently the proposal will require an amendment to the LEP. Will this amendment be crafted to affect all the properties in the E3 zone so as to afford all property owners the same opportunity to develop affordable housing near our CBD or will it be specific to the blocks transfered to Homes North? link
1. Given that concept plans about what will be built (apart from bland statements about what council would like) have not been made public, when, and in what form will our community have the opportunity to comment and influence the type of housing? 2. I understand the current zoning for the land is E3 Productivity support under which "residential accommodation" is prohibited consequently the proposal will require an amendment to the LEP. Will this amendment be crafted to affect all the properties in the E3 zone so as to afford all property owners the same opportunity to develop affordable housing near our CBD or will it be specific to the blocks transfered to Homes North?
bobcrouch asked 3 months agoHi Bob,
Thanks for your questions.At this stage, no concept plans have been developed. It’s not that they haven’t been released — they simply don’t exist yet. Council and Homes North have instead co-designed a set of Design Principles which will guide the brief given to the architect. These principles will be tested with the Project Advisory Committee (currently out for feedback through its draft Terms of Reference) before design work begins.
On zoning: the land at 15 Hill Street is zoned MU1 Mixed Use within the C03 Heritage Conservation Precinct. Residential flat buildings and multi-dwelling housing are permitted with consent in this zone, though detached and semi-detached dwellings are not. A key objective of MU1 is to encourage development that complements nearby office and retail functions. Council’s planning team interprets this to mean that multi-unit development with an attractive, potentially active, street frontage to Hill Street is supported under the current controls.
Planning Zones - Hill Street precinctBecause of this existing zoning, an amendment to the Local Environmental Plan (LEP) is not required for the Hill Street project. The heritage conservation provisions will require the architect to carefully consider the scale, materials, and building envelope in relation to nearby heritage items such as the Post Office.
Separately, Council has already resolved to prepare a township structure plan as part of its upcoming LEP review. If there is appetite for more residential opportunities in Uralla’s commercial areas, this can be properly considered through that strategic planning process, rather than through a one-off rezoning for Hill Street.
Thanks agin for the question, Bob. Feel free to give me a call to discuss 6778 6404
- Emily Sims - USC Strategic Planner.
-
Share With the amount of backlash to this project currently circulating on social media, I would voice my support for the project. Fear and concern is a natural response to change, however, let us, as a community, look beyond that. Uralla is known and loved for its community spirit. It is in this spirit that we should be embracing the opportunity to offer facilitation and support to those in need. We have all experienced the burden of rising costs of living, and many of us have expressed empathy for those who are struggling. This housing project puts those words of empathy into action. As a community, we need to see beyond low income stereotypes and take each individual on their own merits and circumstances, and offer the acceptance that we ourselves would hope to receive if we fell upon hard times. on Facebook Share With the amount of backlash to this project currently circulating on social media, I would voice my support for the project. Fear and concern is a natural response to change, however, let us, as a community, look beyond that. Uralla is known and loved for its community spirit. It is in this spirit that we should be embracing the opportunity to offer facilitation and support to those in need. We have all experienced the burden of rising costs of living, and many of us have expressed empathy for those who are struggling. This housing project puts those words of empathy into action. As a community, we need to see beyond low income stereotypes and take each individual on their own merits and circumstances, and offer the acceptance that we ourselves would hope to receive if we fell upon hard times. on Twitter Share With the amount of backlash to this project currently circulating on social media, I would voice my support for the project. Fear and concern is a natural response to change, however, let us, as a community, look beyond that. Uralla is known and loved for its community spirit. It is in this spirit that we should be embracing the opportunity to offer facilitation and support to those in need. We have all experienced the burden of rising costs of living, and many of us have expressed empathy for those who are struggling. This housing project puts those words of empathy into action. As a community, we need to see beyond low income stereotypes and take each individual on their own merits and circumstances, and offer the acceptance that we ourselves would hope to receive if we fell upon hard times. on Linkedin Email With the amount of backlash to this project currently circulating on social media, I would voice my support for the project. Fear and concern is a natural response to change, however, let us, as a community, look beyond that. Uralla is known and loved for its community spirit. It is in this spirit that we should be embracing the opportunity to offer facilitation and support to those in need. We have all experienced the burden of rising costs of living, and many of us have expressed empathy for those who are struggling. This housing project puts those words of empathy into action. As a community, we need to see beyond low income stereotypes and take each individual on their own merits and circumstances, and offer the acceptance that we ourselves would hope to receive if we fell upon hard times. link
With the amount of backlash to this project currently circulating on social media, I would voice my support for the project. Fear and concern is a natural response to change, however, let us, as a community, look beyond that. Uralla is known and loved for its community spirit. It is in this spirit that we should be embracing the opportunity to offer facilitation and support to those in need. We have all experienced the burden of rising costs of living, and many of us have expressed empathy for those who are struggling. This housing project puts those words of empathy into action. As a community, we need to see beyond low income stereotypes and take each individual on their own merits and circumstances, and offer the acceptance that we ourselves would hope to receive if we fell upon hard times.
KellsBells asked 3 months agoThanks for sharing your thoughts, Kells. In all recent conversations we’ve had with the community — whether for the Community Strategic Plan, the Local Housing Strategy, or the Striking a New Deal project — locals told us again and again how much they value Uralla’s inclusive, friendly, and caring character.
As a Council, we don’t have many levers we can pull when it comes to affordable housing. But one lever we do have is to partner with a community housing provider and make use of Council-owned land. It's a practical step to make sure Uralla remains a place for people from all walks of life.
-
Share I would like to make a few comments on the flawed process that council has exhibited through this Affordable Housing Project. Council has not consulted with the community over the sale of our community owned assets. If the question "Do you think that community owned land should be used for affordable housing" is considered consulting, I find this very deceptive as it does not refer to giving the land away or any other specific and essential information the community need to accurately respond. I think you will find most people answered yes as it would indicate community land being used to house community members and supported by their council. This decision then was ratified by councilors in a closed meeting. So, nine people from our community were given the "privilege" of signing away a community owned asset without discussion. Disposal of an asset of this value should be a transparent and open action. The council’s policy covering disposal of assets states that council can give assets away to charitable organisations, but that the value should not exceed $1000. Council have not only given away the land and buildings, but the annual income they currently provide. The provider Council has chosen to deliver housing support to the vulnerable in our community have below industry benchmark for satisfaction with tenants. Although they have positive feedback for some aspects of their support elements such as complaints handing and building maintenance and negative neighbourhood aspects remain below benchmark standards. Our current tenants have a high standard and expectation of their living experience. Has council informed them the rating of their “new landlord”. I do have some questions regarding the Affordable Housing Project. How many units will be built, and will these be single story buildings? Will the community be engaged in the consultation process or will the current poor communication continue? How will council manage to ensure that Uralla aged and vulnerable citizens be provided housing? How will council legally ensure that the housing provider complies with the KPIs and goals of the council? What will be the demographic breakdown of the project? Will rent to buy be available for local families? How will the target group of workers such as McMaughs care workers, local Cafes workers etc be able to access housing, as the goals of the development state? What additional infrastructure and service provision is the new provider willing to invest to support any additional needs that may result in the community? This process has been flawed from its deceptive start; the residents deserve to have a say in what happens in their community. Councilors are there to represent the people not to act without consent in secret meetings. on Facebook Share I would like to make a few comments on the flawed process that council has exhibited through this Affordable Housing Project. Council has not consulted with the community over the sale of our community owned assets. If the question "Do you think that community owned land should be used for affordable housing" is considered consulting, I find this very deceptive as it does not refer to giving the land away or any other specific and essential information the community need to accurately respond. I think you will find most people answered yes as it would indicate community land being used to house community members and supported by their council. This decision then was ratified by councilors in a closed meeting. So, nine people from our community were given the "privilege" of signing away a community owned asset without discussion. Disposal of an asset of this value should be a transparent and open action. The council’s policy covering disposal of assets states that council can give assets away to charitable organisations, but that the value should not exceed $1000. Council have not only given away the land and buildings, but the annual income they currently provide. The provider Council has chosen to deliver housing support to the vulnerable in our community have below industry benchmark for satisfaction with tenants. Although they have positive feedback for some aspects of their support elements such as complaints handing and building maintenance and negative neighbourhood aspects remain below benchmark standards. Our current tenants have a high standard and expectation of their living experience. Has council informed them the rating of their “new landlord”. I do have some questions regarding the Affordable Housing Project. How many units will be built, and will these be single story buildings? Will the community be engaged in the consultation process or will the current poor communication continue? How will council manage to ensure that Uralla aged and vulnerable citizens be provided housing? How will council legally ensure that the housing provider complies with the KPIs and goals of the council? What will be the demographic breakdown of the project? Will rent to buy be available for local families? How will the target group of workers such as McMaughs care workers, local Cafes workers etc be able to access housing, as the goals of the development state? What additional infrastructure and service provision is the new provider willing to invest to support any additional needs that may result in the community? This process has been flawed from its deceptive start; the residents deserve to have a say in what happens in their community. Councilors are there to represent the people not to act without consent in secret meetings. on Twitter Share I would like to make a few comments on the flawed process that council has exhibited through this Affordable Housing Project. Council has not consulted with the community over the sale of our community owned assets. If the question "Do you think that community owned land should be used for affordable housing" is considered consulting, I find this very deceptive as it does not refer to giving the land away or any other specific and essential information the community need to accurately respond. I think you will find most people answered yes as it would indicate community land being used to house community members and supported by their council. This decision then was ratified by councilors in a closed meeting. So, nine people from our community were given the "privilege" of signing away a community owned asset without discussion. Disposal of an asset of this value should be a transparent and open action. The council’s policy covering disposal of assets states that council can give assets away to charitable organisations, but that the value should not exceed $1000. Council have not only given away the land and buildings, but the annual income they currently provide. The provider Council has chosen to deliver housing support to the vulnerable in our community have below industry benchmark for satisfaction with tenants. Although they have positive feedback for some aspects of their support elements such as complaints handing and building maintenance and negative neighbourhood aspects remain below benchmark standards. Our current tenants have a high standard and expectation of their living experience. Has council informed them the rating of their “new landlord”. I do have some questions regarding the Affordable Housing Project. How many units will be built, and will these be single story buildings? Will the community be engaged in the consultation process or will the current poor communication continue? How will council manage to ensure that Uralla aged and vulnerable citizens be provided housing? How will council legally ensure that the housing provider complies with the KPIs and goals of the council? What will be the demographic breakdown of the project? Will rent to buy be available for local families? How will the target group of workers such as McMaughs care workers, local Cafes workers etc be able to access housing, as the goals of the development state? What additional infrastructure and service provision is the new provider willing to invest to support any additional needs that may result in the community? This process has been flawed from its deceptive start; the residents deserve to have a say in what happens in their community. Councilors are there to represent the people not to act without consent in secret meetings. on Linkedin Email I would like to make a few comments on the flawed process that council has exhibited through this Affordable Housing Project. Council has not consulted with the community over the sale of our community owned assets. If the question "Do you think that community owned land should be used for affordable housing" is considered consulting, I find this very deceptive as it does not refer to giving the land away or any other specific and essential information the community need to accurately respond. I think you will find most people answered yes as it would indicate community land being used to house community members and supported by their council. This decision then was ratified by councilors in a closed meeting. So, nine people from our community were given the "privilege" of signing away a community owned asset without discussion. Disposal of an asset of this value should be a transparent and open action. The council’s policy covering disposal of assets states that council can give assets away to charitable organisations, but that the value should not exceed $1000. Council have not only given away the land and buildings, but the annual income they currently provide. The provider Council has chosen to deliver housing support to the vulnerable in our community have below industry benchmark for satisfaction with tenants. Although they have positive feedback for some aspects of their support elements such as complaints handing and building maintenance and negative neighbourhood aspects remain below benchmark standards. Our current tenants have a high standard and expectation of their living experience. Has council informed them the rating of their “new landlord”. I do have some questions regarding the Affordable Housing Project. How many units will be built, and will these be single story buildings? Will the community be engaged in the consultation process or will the current poor communication continue? How will council manage to ensure that Uralla aged and vulnerable citizens be provided housing? How will council legally ensure that the housing provider complies with the KPIs and goals of the council? What will be the demographic breakdown of the project? Will rent to buy be available for local families? How will the target group of workers such as McMaughs care workers, local Cafes workers etc be able to access housing, as the goals of the development state? What additional infrastructure and service provision is the new provider willing to invest to support any additional needs that may result in the community? This process has been flawed from its deceptive start; the residents deserve to have a say in what happens in their community. Councilors are there to represent the people not to act without consent in secret meetings. link
I would like to make a few comments on the flawed process that council has exhibited through this Affordable Housing Project. Council has not consulted with the community over the sale of our community owned assets. If the question "Do you think that community owned land should be used for affordable housing" is considered consulting, I find this very deceptive as it does not refer to giving the land away or any other specific and essential information the community need to accurately respond. I think you will find most people answered yes as it would indicate community land being used to house community members and supported by their council. This decision then was ratified by councilors in a closed meeting. So, nine people from our community were given the "privilege" of signing away a community owned asset without discussion. Disposal of an asset of this value should be a transparent and open action. The council’s policy covering disposal of assets states that council can give assets away to charitable organisations, but that the value should not exceed $1000. Council have not only given away the land and buildings, but the annual income they currently provide. The provider Council has chosen to deliver housing support to the vulnerable in our community have below industry benchmark for satisfaction with tenants. Although they have positive feedback for some aspects of their support elements such as complaints handing and building maintenance and negative neighbourhood aspects remain below benchmark standards. Our current tenants have a high standard and expectation of their living experience. Has council informed them the rating of their “new landlord”. I do have some questions regarding the Affordable Housing Project. How many units will be built, and will these be single story buildings? Will the community be engaged in the consultation process or will the current poor communication continue? How will council manage to ensure that Uralla aged and vulnerable citizens be provided housing? How will council legally ensure that the housing provider complies with the KPIs and goals of the council? What will be the demographic breakdown of the project? Will rent to buy be available for local families? How will the target group of workers such as McMaughs care workers, local Cafes workers etc be able to access housing, as the goals of the development state? What additional infrastructure and service provision is the new provider willing to invest to support any additional needs that may result in the community? This process has been flawed from its deceptive start; the residents deserve to have a say in what happens in their community. Councilors are there to represent the people not to act without consent in secret meetings.
Duggan1 asked 5 months agoThanks for your message, Duggan1. We understand that this is a significant decision, and we appreciate your desire for more open dialogue about the process and what it means for our community.
We want to be clear that this project has come from a long-standing community concern: that local people—including older residents, essential workers, and families—are struggling to find secure, affordable housing in Uralla. The question in the Housing Strategy survey about Council land was one of several that helped us understand how the community feels about this issue. A large majority of respondents supported the idea of using Council-owned land to create more affordable homes.
Council has taken its role seriously. We’ve looked closely at a number of options—including developing the site ourselves—but this would require significant debt and operational risk we aren’t resourced to carry. That’s why we’ve partnered with Homes North, a regulated not-for-profit provider with experience, capacity, and access to funding that Council doesn’t have. The transfer of land won’t occur until grant funding is secured, and legal safeguards will be in place to ensure the land is used for affordable housing in perpetuity.
We’ve also learned from other communities, including Shoalhaven, who have taken a similar approach and shared their experiences with us directly. We know this kind of project can be done well—and that early engagement with neighbours and residents is crucial to its success. Council is leading the community engagement and communication for the project. We’ve started with letters and online information and are now planning in-person sessions, including opportunities to meet with Homes North and Council leadership.
We want this project to reflect the best of Uralla—its sense of community, care for neighbours, and practical action to meet local needs. We know we haven’t answered every question yet, but we’ll keep updating you as we go.
Q: How many units will be built, and will these be single-storey buildings?
A: The design hasn’t been finalised yet. Early planning will explore options that respect the site’s heritage and neighbourhood character.Q: Will the community be engaged in the consultation process?
A: Yes. Council will host further engagement activities once design work is underway.Q: How will Council ensure Uralla’s aged and vulnerable citizens are provided housing?
A: Council is working with Homes North to develop eligibility criteria. Existing tenants will be prioritised, and eligibility criteria will reflect community needs.Q: How will Council ensure the housing provider complies with agreed goals?
A: Legal agreements and registered conditions on the land title will hold Homes North to long-term obligations. Homes NSW is an important partner organisation in this regard.Q: What will be the demographic breakdown of the project?
A: The housing will prioritise older renters, essential workers, and low-to-moderate income households. Final mix will depend on funding and design.Q: Will rent-to-buy be available for local families?
A: Uralla is committed to exploring a range of different opportunities to increasing the supply of affordable housing, including rent-to-buy. However, rent-to-buy is not being considered for the Hill Street site. This project is for long-term affordable rental housing.Q: How will workers like McMaughs staff and café workers access housing?
A: These groups are a key focus. Eligibility will include essential workers who struggle in the private rental market.Q: What additional infrastructure or services will the provider invest in?
A: Homes North will be responsible for delivering the housing. Council and other agencies will monitor any broader infrastructure needs.Q: Why didn’t Council exhibit the decision?
A: Councillors are democratically elected to make decisions on behalf of the community and to provide strategic leadership. Under current policy, Council wasn’t required to exhibit the land transfer. However, we know this is a significant decision, and we’re committed to making sure the community is kept informed and involved as the project progresses.
Emily Sims
Strategic Planning Officer -
Share As the Dept of Justice is imvolved and registering an interest in Urallas council land on Hill St, does this mean the "affordable housing" be used for those who are leaving jails and returning to society? As there are four aged care units on the land that house local older adults, where will these people be moved to? Will council be having an open forum to discuss these and any other concerns of local residents and ratepayers? on Facebook Share As the Dept of Justice is imvolved and registering an interest in Urallas council land on Hill St, does this mean the "affordable housing" be used for those who are leaving jails and returning to society? As there are four aged care units on the land that house local older adults, where will these people be moved to? Will council be having an open forum to discuss these and any other concerns of local residents and ratepayers? on Twitter Share As the Dept of Justice is imvolved and registering an interest in Urallas council land on Hill St, does this mean the "affordable housing" be used for those who are leaving jails and returning to society? As there are four aged care units on the land that house local older adults, where will these people be moved to? Will council be having an open forum to discuss these and any other concerns of local residents and ratepayers? on Linkedin Email As the Dept of Justice is imvolved and registering an interest in Urallas council land on Hill St, does this mean the "affordable housing" be used for those who are leaving jails and returning to society? As there are four aged care units on the land that house local older adults, where will these people be moved to? Will council be having an open forum to discuss these and any other concerns of local residents and ratepayers? link
As the Dept of Justice is imvolved and registering an interest in Urallas council land on Hill St, does this mean the "affordable housing" be used for those who are leaving jails and returning to society? As there are four aged care units on the land that house local older adults, where will these people be moved to? Will council be having an open forum to discuss these and any other concerns of local residents and ratepayers?
Brenda asked 5 months agoHi Brenda,
Thanks for getting in touch—those are important questions.
The part of the Department of Communities and Justice that’s helping with this project is Homes NSW. They’re not involved in the justice system side of DCJ. The team helping Uralla specialises in working with councils and community housing providers to deliver housing outcomes across the state.
In this case, Homes NSW is helping Council manage the legal and governance aspects of the land transfer to Homes North. They’ll register an interest on the land title so that the land can’t be sold or used for anything other than affordable housing, now or in the future. It’s a safeguard to ensure this land is used for long-term community benefit.
While people leaving prison do need housing, this particular site isn’t being considered for that kind of transitional accommodation. Our focus is on meeting the needs that are most pressing in Uralla right now. That includes older people (like the current tenants in the aged-care units), workers in healthcare and aged care, and single-parent families who are struggling to find secure, affordable rental housing. Council is working closely with Homes North to develop fair eligibility criteria based on community needs.
As for the current tenants in the aged-care units, they are absolutely a priority. Council is working with Homes North to make sure that they can continue to live on the site, and we’re looking at how the project can be staged so they won’t need to move during construction.
We know this is a significant decision, and we’re committed to making sure the community is kept informed and involved as the project progresses. A report will be going to the August Council meeting with further updates, and once more information is available—like design details and timelines—we’ll organise additional opportunities for community engagement, including a public forum.
Thanks again for engaging with the project.
Emily Sims
Strategic Planning Officer
67786404
Lifecycle
-
Council Decision to Transfer Land
Hill Street Affordable Housing Project has finished this stageMay 2025
This step enables Council to enter an agreement with DCJ who will ensure that transaction is ‘arms length,’ enabling the appointment of Homes North and the transfer of land. DCJ will register an interest on the title on behalf of Council, which will ensure the land cannot be sold off and is used for affordable housing in perpetuity
-
Preliminary Design and Planning
Hill Street Affordable Housing Project has finished this stageJune - August 2025
Homes North will use funds from ACEN to commission the early design and planning work for the site. These will help establish how many units can be provided, and what the building will look like. ‘Shovel ready’ projects are preferred by the funding bodies like HAFF
-
Community Information Session #1
Hill Street Affordable Housing Project has finished this stage15 September 2025, 6- 7pm
Come along to the Courthouse to speak to Councillors and the project team
-
Establish the governance framework for the project
Hill Street Affordable Housing Project is currently at this stageAugust -September 2025
This step will establish how Council and the community will work with Homes NSW and Homes North CHP over the life of the development. We are seeking to establish a three-part governance framework that involves the formal legal steering group overseen by Homes NSW, a working group that enables Council to provide technical advice and assistance to Homes North as they undertake the development, and a Project Advisory Committee which will provide a point of contact for Councillors and the community.
-
Design and Planning
this is an upcoming stage for Hill Street Affordable Housing ProjectAugust 2025 – January 2026
Homes North will use funds from ACEN to commission the early design and planning work for the site. These will help establish how many units can be provided, and what the building will look like. ‘Shovel ready’ projects are preferred by the funding bodies like HAFF
-
Community Information Session #2
this is an upcoming stage for Hill Street Affordable Housing ProjectEarly 2026
We hope to be able to present concept designs and preliminary plans at this session
-
Grant Applications
this is an upcoming stage for Hill Street Affordable Housing ProjectJanuary 2026 (TBC)
Homes North will apply for grant funding from Housing Australia Future Fund, anticipated to be announced early next year. If it is successful, the land will be transferred, and the development can get underway.
-
Lodge Development Application
this is an upcoming stage for Hill Street Affordable Housing ProjectCouncil has resolved to waive lodgment fees
-
Assessment
this is an upcoming stage for Hill Street Affordable Housing ProjectCouncil will request that the Development Application be assessed by the Regional Planning Panel. The DA will be notified and exhibited publicly
FAQs
- Where is the land?
- Why has Council chosen to transfer it to Homes North?
- Could Council have done the development itself?
- Who’s paying for this?
- What kind of housing will be built?
- Who will live there?
- Will Council and the community have a say about the development?
- How can I put myself forward for the Project Advisory Committee?
- What is ACEN’s role?
- What’s next?
Who's Listening
-
Strategic Planning Officer
Phone 02 6778 6300 Email esims@uralla.nsw.gov.au
Thank you for your contribution!
Help us reach out to more people in the community
Share this with family and friends